Skip to content Skip to sidebar Skip to footer
Home / this type of model or theory tells people what to do: it prescribes how things should work.

this type of model or theory tells people what to do: it prescribes how things should work.

Post a Comment

9 MIN READ

Theory X and Theory Y

Understanding People's Motivations

What do you call up motivates your people to come to work each morning?

Do you believe that they get great satisfaction from their piece of work and take pride in doing the best possible job? Or exercise you think that they come across it as a brunt, and simply piece of work for the coin?

These assumptions virtually your team members can have a pregnant influence on how you manage them.

What Is Theory X and Theory Y?

In the 1960s, social psychologist Douglas McGregor developed two contrasting theories that explained how managers' behavior about what motivates their people can affect their management style. He labelled these Theory X and Theory Y. These theories continue to be important even today.

In this article and video nosotros will explore McGregor's theory further, and- wait at how it applies in the workplace.

Click here to view a transcript of this video.

What Motivates Your People?

Theory X and Theory Y were kickoff explained by McGregor in his book, "The Human Side of Enterprise," and they refer to 2 styles of direction – authoritarian (Theory X) and participative (Theory Y). [1]

If you believe that your squad members dislike their work and take little motivation, then, according to McGregor, you'll probable utilize an authoritarian way of management. This arroyo is very "easily-on" and ordinarily involves micromanaging people'due south piece of work to ensure that it gets done properly. McGregor chosen this Theory Ten.

On the other hand, if y'all believe that your people take pride in their work and see it as a challenge, then you'll more likely adopt a participative management way. Managers who utilize this approach trust their people to take buying of their work and exercise information technology effectively by themselves. McGregor chosen this Theory Y.

The approach that you have will have a significant impact on your ability to motivate your team members. So, it'south important to understand how your perceptions of what motivates them can shape your direction style.

We'll at present take a more than in-depth look at the two different theories, and discover how and when they can exist useful in the workplace.

Theory X

Theory X managers tend to take a pessimistic view of their people, and assume that they are naturally unmotivated and dislike piece of work.

Work in organizations that are managed like this tin exist repetitive, and people are ofttimes motivated with a "carrot and stick" arroyo. Performance appraisals and remuneration are ordinarily based on tangible results, such as sales figures or product output, and are used to control and "go on tabs" on staff.

This mode of management assumes that workers:

  • Dislike their work.
  • Avert responsibility and demand constant direction.
  • Accept to be controlled, forced and threatened to evangelize work.
  • Need to be supervised at every step.
  • Accept no incentive to work or ambition, and therefore demand to exist enticed past rewards to accomplish goals.

Co-ordinate to McGregor, organizations with a Theory X arroyo tend to have several tiers of managers and supervisors to oversee and direct workers. Authority is rarely delegated, and control remains firmly centralized.

Although Theory X management has largely fallen out of fashion in recent times, big organizations may notice that adopting it is unavoidable due to the sheer number of people that they employ and the tight deadlines that they have to come across.

Theory Y

Theory Y managers have an optimistic stance of their people, and they use a decentralized, participative management style. This encourages a more collaborative, trust-based relationship between managers and their team members.

People accept greater responsibility, and managers encourage them to develop their skills and suggest improvements. Appraisals are regular just, unlike in Theory X organizations, they are used to encourage open up communication rather than to command staff.

Theory Y organizations too give employees frequent opportunities for promotion.

This mode of management assumes that workers are:

  • Happy to work on their own initiative.
  • More involved in decision making.
  • Self-motivated to complete their tasks.
  • Enjoy taking ownership of their work.
  • Seek and accept responsibility, and need little direction.
  • View work every bit fulfilling and challenging.
  • Solve bug creatively and imaginatively.

Theory Y has become more popular amidst organizations. This reflects workers' increasing desire for more than meaningful careers that provide them with more than just money.

It'southward also viewed by McGregor as superior to Theory X, which, he says, reduces workers to "cogs in a machine," and likely demotivates people in the long term.

When to Utilize Theory X and Theory Y

Nearly managers volition likely use a mixture of Theory X and Theory Y. You may, however, detect that you naturally favor 1 over the other. Yous might, for case, have a trend to micromanage or, conversely, you may adopt to take a more hands-off approach.

Although both styles of direction can motivate people, the success of each will largely depend on your team's needs and wants and your organizational objectives.

Y'all may use a Theory Ten style of direction for new starters who will likely need a lot of guidance, or in a situation that requires yous to take control such as a crisis.

Only you lot wouldn't utilize it when managing a team of experts, who are used to working under their own initiative, and need little direction. If you did, it would probable have a demotivating upshot and may fifty-fifty harm your relationship.

Circumstance can also affect your management style. Theory X, for instance, is generally more prevalent in larger organizations, or in teams where work can be repetitive and target-driven.

In these cases, people are unlikely to notice advantage or fulfillment in their work, so a "carrot and stick" arroyo volition tend to be more successful in motivating them than a Theory Y arroyo.

In dissimilarity, Theory Y tends to be favored past organizations that have a flatter structure, and where people at the lower levels are involved in determination making and take some responsibility.

The Disadvantages of Theory X and Theory Y

Nonetheless, both theories have their challenges. The restrictive nature of Theory X, for example, could crusade people to become demotivated and non-cooperative if your approach is also strict. This may pb to high staff turnover and could damage your reputation in the long term.

Conversely, if you adopt a Theory Y arroyo that gives people as well much freedom, it may allow them to stray from their key objectives or lose focus. Less motivated individuals may also take advantage of this more than relaxed working surroundings by shirking their work.

If this happens, yous may need to accept dorsum some control to ensure that everyone meets their team and organizational goals.

Warning

Your assumptions and how y'all assess your people'south needs and wants volition likely be the biggest influencers on your management mode. Notwithstanding, it's of import that y'all challenge your assumptions and review your team members' private requirements regularly. This will let you lot to adapt your approach accordingly.

Key Points

The concept of Theory Ten and Theory Y was adult by social psychologist Douglas McGregor. Information technology describes two contrasting sets of assumptions that managers make about their people:

  • Theory 10 – people dislike piece of work, have lilliputian appetite, and are unwilling to take responsibility. Managers with this assumption motivate their people using a rigid "carrot and stick" approach, which rewards good performance and punishes poor functioning.
  • Theory Y – people are cocky-motivated and enjoy the claiming of work. Managers with this assumption have a more collaborative human relationship with their people, and motivate them past allowing them to work on their own initiative, giving them responsibility, and empowering them to make decisions.

Though your assumptions about what motivates your people will probable have the biggest impact on which of these two approaches you lot take, your choice tin can besides be shaped by several other factors. These include your organizational structure (tiered or flat), the blazon of work that your people do (repetitive or challenging), and their skill level (amateur or experienced).

mayodoneshearn.blogspot.com

Source: https://www.mindtools.com/pages/article/newLDR_74.htm

You may like these posts

Post a Comment for "this type of model or theory tells people what to do: it prescribes how things should work."