Medicine to Make You Act Like a Baby

You lot know about how individuals gain control of the power of the State and and so abuse that power similar former US President George "Dubya" Bush?  "Dubya" started a war in Iraq which was highly profitable for some Us businesses.  He accomplished this b y claiming Iraq had a nuclear weapons plan which was a serious world security threat when Republic of iraq did non and when it had already been bombed into oblivion by the war his Dad George Bush Snr waged on Iraq in 1992: Valerie Plame Wilson: the housewife CIA spy who was 'fair game' for Bush United kingdom of great britain and northern ireland The Telegraph Past Chrissy Iley 15 February 2011.

Call up how Bush was supported by UK Premier Tony Blair who helped past persuading the British Parliament to join the The states with faked "intelligence" of Republic of iraq'south weapons of mass destruction which did not exist but which Blair claimed could be deployed within 40 minutes and posed a serious security threat?

If you call back that then y'all volition know how these kinds of people manipulate the media.  Notice how they persuade us we are in imminent danger of some threat or other and that they can save us all if nosotros trust them?

This trickery is not new.  It had been used for well over a century with smallpox.  The myth continues to this day.

On CHS nosotros wrote previously about how unscientific the claim is that smallpox was eradicated by vaccination when that frankly is nonsense scientifically.  The demise of the affliction came near as a outcome of the interaction of three completely different factors: isolation, attenuation and improved living conditions, specially nutrition and sanitation. The effect cannot be attributable to the smallpox vaccine – whatsoever vaccine which takes over 100 years to piece of work ipso facto proves itself not to have:

Small-scale Pox – Big Prevarication – Bioterrorism Implications of Flawed Theories of Eradication

There was a nasty disease called smallpox and it did impale people long ago.

This was especially the case when the poor moved to the cities during the industrial revolution looking for work and choked them in overcrowded unsanitary slums ripe for convenance and spreading disease: London's first park built after rich feared disease spread from slums Great britain The Independent By Andy McSmith Fri 07 Nov 2008; Hygiene History in the Industrialized World.

The eye and upper classes needed to exist reassured the State would keep them safe from the threat of disease.  The majority of the population of entire countries were persuaded their States could achieve this by ensuring the so truly "great unwashed" masses would be vaccinated and the disease controlled.  The trouble was this was a myth but the people wanted to believe and were persuaded.

Smallpox vaccination did non piece of work and sometimes killed every bit many or more than the disease itself whilst many of the "vaccinated" still contracted the disease: Smallpox Mortality, UK, U.s., Sweden.

Now you lot tin can read a relatively short just well-referenced history of the myth of vaccination and the myth of its office in the eradication of smallpox:

Online Version – Vaccination: A Mythical History ~ by Roman Bystrianyk and Suzanne Humphries Doctor – August 27, 2013

SMALLPOX MORTALITY- UK, The states & SWEDEN

In the graphs below notice the big numbers of deaths caused past the smallpox vaccine itself.  By 1901 in the UK, more than people died from the smallpox vaccination than from smallpox itself.  The severity of the disease dimished with improved living standards and was not vanquished by vaccination, as the medical "consensus" view tells us. Any vaccine which takes 100 years to "work" did not.  On whatever scientific assay of the history and data, crediting smallpox vaccine for the decline in smallpox appears misplaced.

When during 1880-1908 the City of Leicester in England stopped vaccination compared to the residual of the United kingdom and elsewhere, its survival rates soared and smallpox death rates plummeted [come across table beneath].  Leicester's approach too cost far less.

[Click Graph to Overstate – Opens In New Window]

[Click Graph to Enlarge – Opens In New Window]

Extracts from "LEICESTER: Sanitation versus Vaccination" By J.T. Biggs J.P.

[Download Entire Volume as .pdf 43 Mb  – Or Read Online]

Table 21

SMALLPOX FATALITY RATES, cases in vaccinated and re-vaccinated populations compared with "unprotected" Leicester – 1860 to 1908.

Proper name.	Menstruation.	Pocket-size-Pox.  Cases	Modest-Pox. Deaths.	Fatality-rate per cent. of Cases
Japan	1886-1908	288,779	77,415	26.eight
British Army (United kingdom)	1860-1908	i,355	96	7.one
British Army (Republic of india)	1860-1908	2,753	307	11.1
British Army (Colonies)	1860-1908	934	82	8.viii
Royal Navy	1860-1908	ii,909	234	8.0
One thousand Totals and case fatality charge per unit per cent, over all		296,730	78,134	26.3
Leicester (since giving up vaccination)	1880-1908	ane,206	61	v.one

Biggs said "In this comparing, I have given the numbers of revaccinated cases, and deaths, and each fatality-charge per unit separately and together, so that they may be compared either mode with Leicester. In pro-vaccinist linguistic communication, may I inquire, if the excessive small-pox fatality of Japan, of the British Regular army, and of the Royal Navy, are not due to vaccination and revaccination, to what are they due? Information technology would afford an interesting psychical study were we able to know to what heights of eloquent glorification Sir George Buchanan would have soared with a corresponding upshot—but on the opposite side."

TABLE 29.

Minor-Pox Epidemics, Price, and Fatality Rates Compared

	Vaccinal Condition	Small-scale-Pox Cases	Small-Pox Deaths	Fatality-rate Per Cent	Cost of Epidemic
London 1900-02	Well Vaccinated	ix,659	1,594	16.50	£492,000
Glasgow 1900-02	Well Vaccinated	3,417	377	11.03	£ 150,000
Sheffield 1887-88	Well Vaccinated	7,066	688	9.73	£32,257
Leicester 1892-94	Practically Unvaccinated	393	21	5.34	£2,888
Leicester 1902-04	Practically Unvaccinated	731	xxx	4.10	£1,602

[Click Graph to Enlarge – Opens In New Window]

[Click Graph to Enlarge – Opens In New Window]

[Click Graph to Overstate – Opens In New Window]

__________________________________________

Vaccination: A Mythical History ~ by Roman Bystrianyk and Suzanne Humphries MD

– August 27, 2013

With the budgeted flu season and the enthusiastic calls to use the influenza vaccine, you might be wondering where the idea of vaccination got its commencement. Where did the idea of injecting whole or bits of microbes and other substances into people in an try to provide protection against contagious disease begin?

Many medical and history books present a simple tale of the origin of vaccination. Nearly present the same basic tale of the bright observation of a simple country md and his backbone in attempting to thwart a deadly and frightening illness of that time – smallpox, or as it was often called the speckled monster. In a recent and popular book, The Panic Virus, the author reiterates this classic tale.

In 1796, Jenner enlisted a milkmaid named Sarah Nelmes and an eight-year old boy named James Phipps to test his theory. Jenner transferred pus from Nelmes's cowpox blisters onto incisions he'd made in Phipps's easily. The boy came down with a slight fever, simply goose egg more. Later, Jenner gave Phipps a standard smallpox inoculation – which should have resulted in a full-diddled, albeit balmy, instance of the disease. Cipher happened. Jenner tried inoculating Phipps with smallpox over again; again, nothing. [one]

Edward Jenner's idea somewhen became known equally vaccination, which is derived from the Latin give-and-take for cow – vacca. It was originally referred to as cowpoxing, simply eventually the term vaccination was adopted. As the story goes, with this invention in identify, smallpox would be tamed and the globe would be freed from the terror of the affliction.

Such is the stuff of legends. The story is not unlike the archetype Greek legends of Theseus defeating the child-devouring Minotaur, or Perseus beheading the deadly serpent-headed Medusa, or many other classic stories of the dauntless hero defeating a deadly enemy. The Jenner legend has been reduced to a simple and memorable story of a hero defeating the deadly enemy, smallpox. Authors claim that with vaccination in place, "billions of lives" have been saved.[two]

Just legendary heroes, particularly those that are used to back up a belief, reach an iconic status while any unsavory aspects about the hero and the story are ignored or forgotten. Mythical tales are designed to evoke a positive emotional response to influence societal thinking.

The tale of defeating smallpox begins well earlier the story of our hero. It begins with the concept of using small amounts of smallpox pus and scratching it into the arms of healthy people. This idea was introduced to the Western earth past Lady Mary Wortley Montagu in 1717. She had returned from the Ottoman Empire with cognition of the exercise of inoculation confronting smallpox, known every bit variolation. This type of inoculation was simply a thing of infecting a person with smallpox at a fourth dimension and in a setting of his choosing. The idea behind inoculation was that, in a controlled setting, people would do better against the affliction than if they contracted it at some possibly less desirable time and place in the time to come.

The thought was embraced by the medical profession and enthusiastically proficient. Simply because of the complexity and danger involved, inoculation remained an performance that could only exist afforded by the wealthy.[3] The process did often aid protect the individual that was inoculated, but there was still an estimated ii-v% that died as a result.[four,5] Still, this was an improvement compared to a 20-25% bloodshed charge per unit in those that had naturally contracted smallpox during an epidemic.[6] But, was the difference in bloodshed due to inoculation alone? Or could it have had something to do with the fact that the wealthy had better access to more nutritious food and a cleaner environment than the majority of lodge?

There was ane major and mostly unacknowledged drawback to variolation – those inoculated could and did spread smallpox creating more than deaths than there would have been naturally. In a 1764 article the writer recognized that smallpox was a contagious disease and that the exercise of variolation would create new vectors to spread it. He compared the smallpox deaths in the 38 years before the introduction of variolation to the 38 years after, and found that smallpox deaths had increased⎯non decreased. He was forced to conclude that variolation on the whole, led to worse problems, because it caused more deaths than lives saved.

It is incontestably like the plague a contagious disease, what tends to terminate the progress of the infection tends to lessen the danger that attends information technology; what tends to spread the contagion, tends to increase that danger; the practice of Inoculation manifestly tends to spread the contagion, for a contagious disease is produced past Inoculation where it would not otherwise accept been produced; the place where information technology is thus produced becomes a eye of contamination, whence it spreads non less fatally or widely than it would spread from a heart where the disease should happen in a natural fashion; these centers of contamination are manifestly multiplied very greatly by Inoculation . . .[seven]

However, while the popularity of variolation varied, the problem of information technology spreading smallpox, was largely unrecognized. Because variolation had go a very lucrative procedure it was enthusiastically continued by most of the medical profession through the 1700s and into the early 1800s. Smallpox continued to be spread by this medically-sanctioned procedure.

At present enters the hero of our fable. It was rumored amid milkmaids that infection with cowpox would protect ane from smallpox. In 1796, believing these stories, Edward Jenner performed an experiment on an eight-yr-old boy named James Phipps. He took disease thing that he believed to be cowpox from lesions on a dairymaid, Sarah Nelmes, and vaccinated James Phipps with information technology. He later deliberately exposed the child to smallpox as a test to see if he was protected by the cowpox inoculation. When the boy did non contract clinical smallpox, it was assumed that the technique of vaccination was successful.

In 1798 Jenner published his results claiming lifelong protection against smallpox using his discovery with just rumors to back up his contention. While he promoted the use of his technique based on the tale that someone infected with cowpox would be immune to smallpox, there were doctors of the time who challenged this myth, considering they had seen smallpox follow cowpox. At a meeting of the Medico-Convivial Social club, Jenner was ridiculed over his practice.

But he [Jenner] no sooner mentioned information technology than they laughed at it. The cow doctors could have told him of hundreds of cases where small-pox had followed cow-pox . . . [eight]

From the beginning at that place were problems with Jenner's procedure. In 1799, Mr. Drake vaccinated a number of children with cowpox thing obtained from Edward Jenner. The children were and then tested by beingness inoculated with smallpox to encounter if the cowpox process had been effective. All of them adult smallpox, and vaccination failed to protect whatsoever of them. Jenner received the written report but decided to ignore the results because they were not in support of his theory.[9]

Vaccination was quickly embraced by many in the medical profession every bit the respond to combating smallpox. By 1801, an estimated 100,000 people had already been vaccinated in England with the belief that the procedure would produce lifelong protection. The medical community continued to embrace Jenner's ideas amidst numerous accounts that refuted the theory of vaccination. Early reports indicated that there were cases of people who had cowpox, or were vaccinated, and were even so dying of smallpox. Specific cases of cowpox and vaccine failure were reported in the 1809 Medical Observer.

A Kid was vaccinated by Mr. Robinson, surgeon and apothecary, at Rotherham, towards the end of the twelvemonth 1799. A month later information technology was inoculated with pocket-size-pox matter without upshot, and a few months after took confluent small-pox and died. two. A woman-servant to Mr. Gamble, of Bungay, in Suffolk, had cow-pox in the casual way from milking. Seven years later she became nurse to Yarmouth Hospital, where she caught pocket-size-pox, and died. 3 and 4. Elizabeth and John Nicholson, three years of age, were vaccinated at Battersea in the summer of 1804. Both contracted small-pox in May, 1805 and died . . . 13. The child of Mr. R died of small-pox in October 1805. The patient had been vaccinated, and the parents were bodacious of its security. The vaccinator's name was concealed. 14. The child of Mr. Hindsley at Mr. Adam's office . . . died of small-scale-pox a year afterward vaccination.[ten]

Reports through the early on 1800s began to accumulate showing vaccination was not living up to its promise to protect from smallpox. A report in 1810 from the Medical Observer noted 535 cases of small-pox after vaccination, 97 fatal cases, and 150 cases of vaccine injuries.[11] Note that 97 deaths out of 535 cases is an 18% fatality rate and is essentially the same fatality rate as smallpox earlier vaccination was introduced. This high fatality charge per unit forth with 150 vaccine-related injuries was a direct challenge to this new and highly lauded medical procedure.

Another article in 1817 reflected the reality of vaccination failure.

. . . the number of all ranks suffering under Pocket-size Pox, who have previously undergone Vaccination by the near good practitioners, is at present alarmingly cracking.[12]

In 1818 Thomas Brown, a surgeon with 30 years of feel in Musselburgh, Scotland, published an article discussing his experience with vaccination. He stated that he was originally extremely positive in promoting vaccination and that no one in the medical profession "could outstrip me in zeal for promoting vaccine do." But after vaccinating 1,200 persons, he became disappointed in the promise of vaccination. His experience was that, subsequently vaccination, people still could contract and fifty-fifty die from smallpox, and that he could no longer back up the practice.[thirteen]

Like today, surgeons and doctors of the time were handsomely compensated for performing vaccination and thus had a trend to encompass it equally a new form of income. It is therefore quite significant for a dr. to have spoken out against it equally Dr. Brown did.

Continued observations showed that smallpox could all the same infect those who previously had smallpox and that those who were vaccinated could also be infected.

. . . during the years 1820, 1, and, ii [1820-1822] there was a bang-up hubbub most the small-pox. It broke out with the corking epidemic to the north . . . Information technology pressed shut to domicile to Dr. Jenner himself . . . It attacked many who had had minor-pox before, and oft severely; about to decease; and of those who had been vaccinated, it left some solitary, only savage upon great numbers.[xiv]

William Cobbett was a farmer, journalist, and English pamphleteer. In 1829 he wrote near the failure of vaccination to protect people from smallpox. Cobbett considered vaccination to be an unproven and fraudulent medical practice. He noted that:

. . . hundreds of instances, persons cow-poxed by JENNER HIMSELF, have taken the existent pocket-size-pox later, and accept either died from the disorder, or narrowly escaped with their lives![15]

During this time vaccine cloth was the "humanized" grade, which meant that textile was taken from the arm of a previously vaccinated person to vaccinate the adjacent person. Arm-to-arm vaccination continued for decades, but every bit failures increased there was a conventionalities that the vaccine had lost its original supposed potency, and at that place were calls to obtain fresh material direct from cows.[16]

While the legend maintained that the vaccine textile came from cows, Jenner actually believed the fabric originated from an infectious status of horses called the "grease." From this and other beliefs, at that place were many attempts to recreate an original cow-based vaccine. All these attempts failed.[17] Some believed that cowpox was simply smallpox that was passed through cows and somehow made into a new disease.[18] This faulty belief would result in the creation of more smallpox epidemics.

In 1836 in Attenborough, Massachusetts, Dr. John C. Martin took fluid from the pock of a human being who died from smallpox and inoculated information technology onto a moo-cow's udder. He then took pus from that moo-cow and used information technology to vaccinate people. A large smallpox epidemic ensued causing panic and sickness in many people over the subsequent months.[19] A later inquiry determined that this was nothing more than the old practice of smallpox inoculation.[twenty]

Non merely was vaccination failing and causing smallpox epidemics, but in that location were as well reports of deaths from other causes shortly after vaccination. For example, a skin condition called erysipelas was a particularly prolonged and painful mode to die.

. . . a boy from Somers-town, aged v years, "small-pox confluent, unmodified (nine days)." He had been vaccinated at the age of 4 months; one cicatrix . . . the wife of a labourer, from Lambeth, aged 22 years, "small-pox confluent, unmodified (eight days)." Vaccinated in infancy in Suffolk; two good cicatrices . . . the son of a mariner, aged x weeks, and the son of a sugar bakery, anile xiii weeks, died of "general erysipelas after vaccination, effusion of the brain."[21]

Because arm-to-arm vaccination was beingness used, other diseases could be spread causing diverse epidemics. Infectious diseases attributed to vaccination included tuberculosis and syphilis. In 1863 Dr. Ricord spoke earlier the University at Paris.

Beginning I rejected the idea that syphilis could be transplanted by vaccination. But facts accumulated more than and more, and at present I must concede the possibility of the transfer of syphilis by means of the vaccine. I do this very reluctantly. At nowadays I practice not hesitate longer to acknowledge and proclaim the reality of the fact.[22]

As it became increasingly clear throughout the 1800s to more than doctors and citizens that vaccination was not what it was promised to be, refusals increased. In order to bargain with this, the judicial system intervened. In 1855, Massachusetts created a set of comprehensive laws providing for widespread vaccination.[23]

These laws and compulsory vaccination did goose egg to curb the problem of smallpox. Data from Boston that begins in 1811 shows that, starting around 1837, there were periodic smallpox epidemics that culminated in the great 1872 epidemic. After 1855, there were further smallpox epidemics in 1859-threescore, 1864-65, and 1867 and the infamous epidemic in 1872-73. This was the almost severe smallpox epidemic since the introduction of vaccination.[24] These repeat smallpox epidemics showed that the strict vaccination laws instituted past Massachusetts in 1855 had no effect at all (Graph i). In fact, more people died in the xx years subsequently the strict Massachusetts vaccination compulsory laws than in the 20 years earlier.

Graph 1: Boston smallpox bloodshed rate from 1841 to 1880.

By this point, the medical profession no longer claimed lifelong protection against smallpox from a single vaccination. Instead, claims were made that vaccination made smallpox less probable to kill or that smallpox would be milder. Calls were then fabricated for revaccination. Claims were made that revaccination had to be performed anywhere from yearly to every ten years.[25]

While the majority of the medical profession supported vaccination, there were those that spoke out against the procedure. Dr. Longstaffe, a prominent physician of Edinburgh England noted that huge profits were being made by vaccinators. Immense financial proceeds combined with the forcefulness of law created the perfect environs that would impose vaccination upon the citizens of the Western globe.

The public vaccinators have received immense sums from Parliament . . . In 1850 alone they amounted to £54,727, and in the present year they volition go nearly a quarter meg. Other sums, also, which I cannot proper name, have been granted for the purpose of sustaining this monstrous fraud. Has ever a quack remedy produced so much gain?

[26]

In England, governmental control strengthened over the years, with progressively stricter laws designed to enforce vaccination. Laws previously passed in 1840 and 1853 were consolidated into oppressive compulsory laws in 1867 that included fines for parents who did not vaccinate their children. However, through the 1800s, periodic smallpox epidemics connected to occur. A great pandemic struck in 1872 and took the lives of thousands, even those who were vaccinated.

Every recruit that enters the French ground forces is vaccinated. During the Franco-Prussian war there were twenty-three thousand iv hundred and 60-nine cases of small-pox in that army. The London Lancet of July 15, 1871 said:

Of nine m three hundred and 90-two small-pox patients in London hospitals, half dozen thousand eight hundred and l-four had been vaccinated. Seventeen and one-half per cent of those attacked died. In the whole state more one hundred and twenty-two chiliad vaccinated persons accept suffered from minor-pox . . . Official returns from Federal republic of germany bear witness that between 1870 and 1885 one one thousand thousand vaccinated persons died from small-pox.[27]

Concerns over vaccine safety, effectiveness, and governmental infringement on personal liberty and freedom through compulsory vaccination stoked the fires of the anti-vaccine movement. People began to resist the regime and chose to pay fines. Some even accepted imprisonment rather than assuasive vaccination for themselves or their children. The public backfire culminated in the smashing demonstration in Leicester England, in 1885. That same twelvemonth Leicester's regime, which had pushed for vaccination through the use of fines and jail time, was replaced with a new government that was opposed to compulsory vaccination. By 1887, the vaccination coverage rates had dropped to 10%.[28]

Instead of relying on vaccination, people began to rely on proper sanitation, quarantine of smallpox patients and thorough disinfection of their homes. They believed this technique was a cheap and constructive means that eliminated the demand for vaccination. Withal, there were dire predictions from the majority of the medical community that strongly endorsed vaccination and believed the low vaccination rate would result in a terrible "massacre," especially in the "unprotected" children.[29]

Despite such prophesies of doom from the medical profession, the majority of the town'southward residents were steadfast in their belief that vaccination was not necessary to control smallpox. The prophecy that the Leicester residents would eventually be plagued with disaster never did come to pass. Low vaccination rates resulted in lower smallpox rates and deaths, than in well-vaccinated towns.[xxx] In fact, the lower vaccination rates correlated to an overall decrease in smallpox deaths (Graph 2). Leicester showed that past abandoning vaccination in favor of what became termed as the "Leicester Method," deaths from smallpox were far lower than when vaccination rates were high.

The experience of unvaccinated Leicester is an eye-opener to the people and an centre-sore to the pro-vaccinists the world over. Here is a great manufacturing town having a population of most a quarter of a one thousand thousand, which has demonstrated past a crucial examination of an experience extending over a catamenia of more than than a quarter of a century, that an unvaccinated population has been far less susceptible to small-pox and far less afflicted by that disease since it abandoned vaccination than it was at a time when ninety-five per cent of its births were vaccinated and its adult population well re-vaccinated.[31]

While vaccination was often promoted every bit a safe procedure, information technology frequently caused sickness or even decease. From 1859 to 1922 official deaths related to vaccination were more than 1,600 in England (Graph 3). In fact, from 1906 to 1922 the number of deaths recorded from smallpox vaccination and smallpox were approximately the same (Graph 4).

Graph 2: Leicester England smallpox mortality rate vs. vaccination coverage from 1838 to 1910.

Graph iii: England and Wales total deaths from cowpox and other effects of vaccination from 1859 to 1922.

Graph iv: England and Wales smallpox deaths vs. vaccination deaths from 1906 to 1922

At the terminate of the 1800s, smallpox changed its graphic symbol. Later on the summer of 1897, the severe type of smallpox with its loftier death rate, with rare exception, had entirely disappeared from the United States. Smallpox turned from a illness that killed 1 in 5 of its victims to ane that simply killed anywhere from 1 in fifty and later to equally low equally one in 380. The disease could yet kill, but having become and then much milder, it was ofttimes mistaken for various other pox infections or peel eruptions.

During 1896 a very mild blazon of smallpox began to prevail in the S and after gradually spread over the country. The mortality was very depression and information technology [smallpox] was ordinarily at showtime mistaken for chicken pox. . .[32]

The author of a 1913 article in The Journal of Infectious Diseases presented a tabular array showing that in 1895 and 1896 the smallpox expiry rate was effectually twenty%, equally it had been historically. The tabular array as well showed that after 1896 the death charge per unit fell off rapidly, starting with half dozen% in 1897 to as low as 0.26% by 1908. As the mild class of smallpox replaced the classic type, smallpox could be difficult to tell from chickenpox, which was, by this time, considered a balmy disease of childhood.

. . . chickenpox, is a pocket-size communicable disease of childhood, and is chiefly of import because it frequently gives rising to difficulty in diagnosis in cases of balmy smallpox. Smallpox and chickenpox are sometimes very hard to differentiate clinically.[33]

By the 1920s information technology was recognized that the new grade of smallpox produced fiddling in the way of symptoms, fifty-fifty though few had been vaccinated.

Private cases, or fifty-fifty epidemics, occur in which, although there has been no protection by vaccination, the course of the disease is extremely balmy. The lesions are few in number or entirely absent, and the constitutional symptoms balmy or insignificant.[34]

Despite this extremely low vaccine coverage rate, there was never a resurgence of smallpox. Even though smallpox was non a major issue, the practice of smallpox vaccination continued from the fourth dimension of the last smallpox death in the United States in 1948 up until 1963. This resulted in an estimated 5,000 unnecessary vaccine-related hospitalizations from generalized rash, secondary infections, and encephalitis.

A 1958 written report detailed the cases of 9 children in which 2 died of a skin condition due to vaccination, now being termed eczema vaccinatum. The occurrence of this disease was estimated by the authors to be betwixt 1 in 20,000 to 1 in 100,000 with a fatality rate of 4 to twoscore%.[35] Notwithstanding, they acknowledged that most cases were non reported and there was no accurate accounting on this consequence of vaccination. There were also an estimated 200 to 300 deaths equally the result of smallpox vaccination, while during the same time at that place had only been one smallpox death in 1948.[36]

The last smallpox death in the United States following an importation occurred in 1948, but since that fourth dimension there have been probably 200 to 300 deaths from smallpox vaccination.[37]

Eczema vaccinatum is still occurring today, every bit recently noted in the news. A toddler was infected by his military father later the begetter was vaccinated. Later on a prolonged admission, and a calendar week of experimental treatments including allowed globulin from donor blood and antiviral medication, the toddler recovered. The female parent also required treatment and virus was constitute all over the business firm.[38]

Considering of poor surveillance and vaccine reaction underreporting, the authors of a 1970 written report thought that the number of smallpox vaccine-related deaths could really have been fifty-fifty higher. This study but examined deaths from 1959 to 1968 in the United States. If the deaths were this high in a country with a mod health-care system, what was the total number of deaths from smallpox vaccination from 1800 to the nowadays across the entire world?

In that location were those in the medical community who were relieved that the failure of compulsory vaccination never gained much public scrutiny. Instead, the focus was shifted to new types of vaccinations.

Compulsory vaccination which in one case had the suffrage of the nation has now hardly a serious supporter. We are ashamed to jettison the idea completely and possibly afraid that if we did the accident of some future epidemic might put us in the wrong. Nosotros adopt to allow compulsory vaccination die a natural death and are relieved that the general public is not curious enough to demand an inquest. In the meantime our attention is diverted to other and newer forms of immunisation.[39]

During this time with vaccination every bit almost the only medically promoted style to deal with affliction, at that place were doctors finding amazing successes with smallpox using other methods. Vinegar is a common nutrient production that is fabricated through fermentation of a diversity of sources. An 1877 commodity described the success that Dr. Roth had using vinegar for smallpox prophylaxis.

D. G. Oliphant, M.D., of Toronto, Canada, having read the article on the apply of Acerb acid in scarlet fever, writes of a "vinegar cure" equally practical to small pox. Dr. Roth first claimed wonderful success in treatment regarding vinegar more than reliable as a prophylactic in small-pox than Belladonna in scarlet fever. Dr. Roth gave both to the ill and to the exposed two table-spoonfuls of vinegar, after breakfast and at evening, for fourteen days. Few persons thus treated took the disease at all. None who adopted the prophylactic treatment died, while among those nether ordinary handling the mortality was every bit usual.[xl]

In 1899 Dr. Howe also demonstrated vinegar'southward ability to protect a person from acquiring smallpox. Those who used the vinegar protocol were able to take care of other people with smallpox without fear of contracting the disease. The author notes that despite several hundred exposures, vinegar was protective confronting smallpox and was considered an "established fact."[41]

Again, in 1901 professor MacLean promoted the idea of vinegar as a real preventative of smallpox. Dr. MacLean claimed that apple cider vinegar and no other type of vinegar should be used three or four times a day to protect a person from contracting smallpox.

J.P. MacLean Ph. D., the renowned "anti" Secretary of the Western Reserve Historical Lodge, having readily overthrown the conclusions of all the nifty men who for a century past have been convinced of the efficacy of vaccination for the prevention of smallpox, now comes to the front in the newspapers with the real preventative. "Whatever person who has been exposed demand take no fear of smallpox if he volition take two or three tablespoonfuls of pure cider vinegar three or four times a twenty-four hours." The discussion may now be regarded as closed, and smallpox at terminal is conquered![42]

Apple cider vinegar might seem giddy, just simply because virtually people have been conditioned to accept the historic period-old prophylaxis for smallpox: raw, disease-laden, contaminated pus scrapings from an infected animal's (usually a cow) belly, diluted in glycerin, and scratched into the man arm with a metal prong until the arm was raw and bleeding. What seems sillier now?

Scurvy is a disease that results from a deficiency of vitamin C due to starvation or only an extremely poor or unbalanced diet. Vitamin C is essential for the formation of healthy collagen. Collagen is the protein that forms connective tissue in skin, bones, and blood vessels and also gives support to internal organs. In scurvy, the body is not able to generate adequate collagen or extracellular matrix proteins that serve equally mortar holding cells together and, as a effect, literally comes unglued and falls apart.

William A. Guy, dean of the Medical Section of King'southward College, described the poor diet of aureate miners in California in the 1850s. Thousands of miners subsisted on meat, fatty, coffee, and alcohol while working long, hard days under the unrelenting California sun. The vitamin C-deficient diet led many to develop scurvy.

Scurvy has been very prevalent amidst the gilded miners of California . . . the emigrants upon the overland journeys and at the mines, every bit living almost entirely upon fried bacon or fat pork and flour made into concoction-cakes, and fried in the fat, which completely saturates it. This is washed down with copious librations of strong coffee, and large quantities of brandy or whiskey are taken in the intervals of the meals . . . this has been the diet of thousands for months, nether a scorching lord's day, when the temperature was over a hundred in the shade, the men being at the same time subjected to the well-nigh intense labour.[43]

Although many died of cholera during the California Gilded Blitz of the mid-1800s, an estimated 10,000 men died from scurvy.

During the American Ceremonious State of war twice as many died from nutritional deficiency related diseases as those killed in boxing.[44] For case, the causes of death listed for Indiana soldiers buried at the National Cemetery in Andersonville, Georgia, shows that diarrhea and scurvy direct accounted for at least ii-thirds.[45] Dysentery was the next common crusade of death, with the infamous diseases such as smallpox, typhus, pneumonia, and gangrene responsible for only a small fraction. Those who were killed in actual battle or who died every bit a consequence of their wounds accounted only for 1 percent of the total deaths.

Other big infectious killers such every bit scarlet fever, measles, diphtheria, and whooping cough (as well known as pertussis) all greatly declined during this fourth dimension to where they were either completely eliminated or considered mild childhood illnesses by the mid-1900s. This massive refuse of 99% of deaths in whooping cough and measles occurred before vaccines or antibiotics were available (Graph 5 & half-dozen).

Graph five: England and Wales whooping coughing mortality rate from 1838 to 1978.

Graph 6: England and Wales measles bloodshed charge per unit from 1838 to 1978.

The fairytale legend of a country doctor making a discovery that saved the world from the devastation of smallpox is a key medical belief that continues to be echoed past indoctrinated and naïve doctors whenever vaccines are challenged. Smallpox vaccine, in the minds of medical professionals remains a pillar of their vaccine faith. Only the true history shows us a different reality.

The brand name of vaccination was indoctrinated into the world psyche as something to protect someone from an illness. This belief spawned off numerous other ideas using the same notion of injecting whole or parts of affliction matter into living beings in attempts to protect them from a specific disease. The reality of vaccination is cypher close to the myth.

Other extremely effective alternative methods of sanitation, nutrition, apple cider vinegar, and other solutions were ignored and have since vanished from societal commonage memory. Instead we were left with the mythical history of Jenner's peachy discovery and the continued onslaught of dangerous vaccines to newborn infants. Vaccines are now a regular thing from cradle to grave, all in the name of supposedly healthier people. At present that the curtain has been pulled back on the origins of vaccination, do more and more vaccines seem like a good idea to you lot?

More than information on the history of vaccination including polio, measles, whooping coughing, and lost remedies can be found in Dr Humphries' and Roman Bystrianyk's book "Dissolving Illusions" which can be institute on amazon.com

Bibliography:
1.Seth Mnookin, The Panic Virus, Simon & Schuster, 2011, p. 31.
two.Science the Definitive Visual Guide, DK Publishing, 2009, p. 156.
3.Victor C. Vaughan, MD, Epidemiology and Public Health, St. Louis, C.V. Mosby Company, 1922, p. 189.
iv.Frederick F. Cartwright, Affliction and History, Rupert-Hart-Davis, London, 1972, p. 124.
5.William Douglass, MA, A Summary, Historical and Political, of the First Planting, Progressive Improvements and Present Country of the British Settlements of Northward-America, London, 1760, p. 398.
6.Ann Jannetta, The Vaccinators: Smallpox Medical Knowledge and the 'Opening' of Nippon, Stanford University Printing, 2007, p.179.
7."The Exercise of Inoculation Truly Stated," The Gentleman'southward Magazine and Historical Chronicle, vol. 34, 1764, p. 333.
8.Dr. Walter Hadwen, The Case Against Vaccination, Goddard's Rooms, Gloucester, January 25, 1896, p. 12.
ix.Charles Creighton, Jenner and Vaccination, 1889, pp. 95-96.
10.William Scott Tebb, Doc, A Century of Vaccination and What it Teaches, Swan Sonnenschein & Co., London, 1898, p. 126.
11."Vaccination by Human activity of Parliament," Westminster Review, vol. 131, 1889, p. 101.
12."Observations on Prevailing Diseases," The London Medical Repository Monthly Journal and Review, vol. VIII, July-Dec, 1817, p. 95.
13.Mr. Thomas Dark-brown, Surgeon Musselburgh, "On the Nowadays State of Vaccination," The Edinburgh Medical and Surgical Journal, Volume Fifteenth, 1819, p. 67.
14."Observations by Mr. Fosbroke," The Lancet, vol. II, 1829, p. 583.
15.William Cobbett, Advice to Immature Men and (Incidentally) to Immature Women, 1829, London, pp. 224-225.
sixteen.Dr. Delagrange of Paris, "On the Present State of Vaccination in France," The Lancet, vol. II, 1829, p. 582.
17."Cowpox Origin of," The Doc-chirurgical review and journal of practical medicine, vol. 20, 1834, p. 504.
xviii.Dr. Fiard, "Experiments upon the Communication and Origin of Vaccine Virus," London medical and surgical journal, vol. iv, 1834, p. 796.
xix.Ephraim Cutter, Physician, "Fractional Report on the Production of Vaccine Virus in the The states," Transactions of the American Medical Clan, vol. XXIII, 1872, p. 200.
twenty.Encyclopaedia Britannica, vol. 24, Philadelphia, 1890, p. 25.
21.The Morning Chronicle, Wednesday, April 12, 1854.
22."Vaccination," New York Times, September 26, 1869.
23.Susan Wade Peabody, "Historical Study of Legislation Regarding Public Wellness in the State of New York and Massachusetts," The Journal of Infectious Diseases, Supplement no. iv, February 1909, p. fifty-51.
24."Pocket-sized-pox and Revaccination," Boston Medical and Surgical Journal, vol. CIV, no. half-dozen, February 10, 1881, p. 137.
25.Dr. Olesen, "Vaccination in the Philippine Islands," Medical Picket, April 1911, vol. 19, no. four, p. 255.
26."Vaccination," New York Times, September 26, 1869.
27.One thousand. W. Harman, Doc, "A Medico's Argument Against the Efficacy of Virus Inoculation," Medical Brief: A Monthly Journal of Scientific Medicine and Surgery: vol. 28, no. one, 1900, p. 84.
28.The Parliamentary Debates, vol. CCCXXVI, June 1, 1888, p. 933.
29."A Sit-in Confronting Vaccination," Boston Medical and Surgical Journal, April sixteen, 1885, p. 380.
xxx.J. W. Hodge, Doc, "Prophylaxis to be Realized Through the Attainment of Health, Not by the Propagation of Disease," The St. Louis Medical and Surgical Journal, vol. LXXXIII, July 1902, p. 15.
31.J. Due west. Hodge, MD, "How Minor-Pox was Banished from Leicester," Twentieth Century Mag, vol. Iii, no. sixteen, January, 1911, p. 342.
32.Charles Five. Chapin, "Variation in Type of Infectious Disease as Shown by the History of Smallpox in the United States," The Journal of Infectious Diseases, vol. xiii, no. 2, September 1913, p. 173.
33.John Gerald Fitzgerald, Peter Gillespie, Harry Mill Lancaster, An introduction to the practice of preventive medicine, C.V. Mosby Company, 1922, p. 197.
34.John Cost Crozer Griffith, The diseases of infants and children, Volume ane, W.B. Saunders Visitor, 1921, p. 370.
35.Audrey H. Reynolds Doctor and Howard A. Joos MD, Exczema Vaccinatum, Pediatrics, August 1958, pp. 259-267
36.David Koplow, Smallpox: The Right to Eradicate a Global Scourge, 2004, University of California Press, p.21.
37.The Yale journal of biological science and medicine, 1968, vol. 41, p. 10.
38.Maggie Fox, 2007, Toddler Survives Smallpox Vaccine Reaction, Reuters.
39.Dr. Charles Cyril Okell, "From a bacteriological dorsum-number," Lancet, January 1, 1938, pp. 48-49.
forty."Acerb Acid in Ruddy Fever," American homoeopathist—A Monthly Periodical of Medical Surgical and Sanitary Science, vol. one, no. 1, July 1877, p. 73.
41."Vinegar to Foreclose Smallpox," The Critique, January 15, 1899, p. 289.
42.Cleveland Journal of Medicine, vol. VI, no. i, 1901, p. 58.
43.William A. Guy, "Lectures on Public Health. Addressed to the Students of the Theological Department of King's College," Medical Times, vol. 23, January 4 to June 28, 1851, p. 283.
44.Roy Porter, The Greatest Benefit to Mankind, Harper Collins, New York, 1997, p. 399.
45.Report of the Unveiling And Dedication of Indiana Monument at Andersonville, Georgia (National Cemetery), November 26 1908, pp. 73-102.

Filed nether: ADHD, Aspergers, autism, Child Health Rubber, MMR, vaccination, vaccine, vaccine court, Vaccine Damage, Vaccines | Tagged: ADHD, Anti-vaccine Safety, Aspergers, autism, Cervarix, Gardasil, government, Health, HPV, HPV vaccine, medicine, mercury, MMR, politics, science, thimerosal, thiomersal, vaccination, vaccine, vaccine court, Vaccine Damage, Vaccines |

mayodoneshearn.blogspot.com

Source: https://childhealthsafety.wordpress.com/2013/12/23/smallpox-eradication-one-of-historys-biggest-lies-how-vaccination-did-not-eradicate-smallpox/